
xkcd, in its awesomeness, has managed to poignantly illustrate a deep and meaningful concept with none other than descriptive statistics and a bar chart. Jay Livingston, in his awesomeness, has managed to connect the deeper meaning of the comic to Stanley Milgram's experiements.
In Milgram's class assignment, people were supposed to approach strangers on a subway and ask for their seat. Many students, upon being faced with the task, literally were nauseated. And that was just asking for a seat!
I wondered what would happen if xkcd's little statistical test were run by gender. Who regrets kissing/not kissing more? I could formulate hypotheses in which a female would be more likely to regret kissing rather than not. For example, my friends and I witnessed an instance at ASA in which two women quite likely regretted dancing and flirting with two men (the men didn't take it kindly when the women decided NOT to go home with them). And since it is typically considered the man's job to make a move, we might also expect less statements from women overall, regardless of whether their regret centered on action or inaction.
Without further ado, here's my findings:
I think Jay has it on the nose that people are generally more likely to regret inaction than action. But it's interesting that men are more likely to regret either (both?) when it comes to kissing. However, the overall pattern of greater regret over inaction remained. I am guessing that if we ran further tests on this data, we'd find that the inaction/action regret differential is more substantial for men than for women, indicating that there may actually be something to my first hypothesis after all.
Further research is needed in order to determine whether this gender difference is consistent across behaviors. Are men more likely to be regretful in general? Or just when it comes to making a move?
And how can we help these poor, regretful souls?
Wednesday, August 6, 2008
Regrets
Posted by
Anomie
at
7:51 PM
Labels: sex and gender, social psychology
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


9 comments:
I have an alternative explanation for the finding: opportunities to regret. Perhaps most of us kiss other people relatively rarely compared to the number of times we could have possibly kissed other people (ok, maybe I'm just generalizing from personal experience here), we have many more opportunities to regret not kissing than we do kissing. Therefore, per instance, the rate is currently unknowable.
I'm not really sure it affects your gender story though.
C'mon sociologist -- what makes you so sure "should/shouldn't have kissed him" were all by women and "should/shouldn't have kissed her" were all by men?
Damn, heteronormativity rears its ugly head again! :$
Take heed blogosphere, this is what happens when you let economic sociologists and anthropologists onto your blog - you get a bunch of holes punched into your stories.
Definitely opportunities, yes. I'm a bit embarrassed about the heteronormative angle, though. But then, I don't know how I would control for that in a Google search study, anyway.
Dan. Would substituting "had sex with" reduce the opportunity discrepancy? The trouble with Googling for this is that the numbers are small, and there are other ways of saying it, and with "fucked" you can get a lot of "fucked up," "fucked with," "fucked over," that have nothing to do with sex.
But with less charged past participles (done, gone, etc., I think shoulda beats shouldn'ta by a wide margin.
(Full disclosure. I gave Anomie a heteronormative hug at the Scatterplot party and didn't regret it.)
Re: Heteronormativity - presumably, given the predominance of hets, this problem would at best introduce some error into the analysis. We could make some assumptions about the distribution of posters and test them with a little follow up of random links - you could see if a substantial percentage seemed to be from authors of the same gender as the pronoun employed. So, I think that problem is superable (that's a word, right?), but definitely should be addressed.
I don't know about "had sex with". I think we need some in-depth qualitative interviewing before making strong assumptions about opportunities for that as well. It's a messy problem.
That being said, my "hole" may not really be relevant. If the point is to make an argument that we (the internet using folks anyway) are tending to err in one direction, then the underlying frequency isn't so relevant - all you need to show is that we tend to regret one thing more than the other, and thus should adjust our thresholds for whether or not to kiss. (Switching to absurd rat choice mode...) It might end up being that the optimal 'kiss threhsold' to minimize regret would still involve not kissing more often than kissing, but this analysis would suggest we should shift in the direction of more kissing from wherever it is we started.
Man, I need to get out more.
There's something rather amusing about the idea of someone calling herself "Anomie" running around engaging in heteronormative hugs.
And yes, Dan, I do believe that talking about - ahem - "the optimal 'kiss threhsold' to minimize regret" is a sign you need to get out more (she says from the comfort of her couch). Perhaps test these theories with some experiments? Ya know, for the sake of science?
Regarding heteronormativity: "he should have kissed her" yields 837 hits, "he should have kissed him" yields 6. 197-2 for "she should..."
Full disclosure: I was sad Jay didn't hug me at the Scatterplot party.
Ah, but aren't we veering into something more akin to sympathetic regret when we start talking about other people's shoulda/shouldn'ta's?
I would like to point out that I can't possibly have any heteronoromative bias whatsoever. After all, some of my best cars are gay.
Post a Comment