Tuesday, August 12, 2008

Academic Job Search Pointers

After many, many years of apprenticeship, the journeyman prepares to strike out on her own, to establish her own fortress (or perhaps a nice tower room) within one of the many castles dotting the land of Academia.

But first there's that minor nuisance of a hazing ritual called the Academic Job Search.

Now, Anomie's apprenticeship has not quite finished, for - alas- it will not be until this time next year that she is engaged in such lovely tasks as obsessively perusing job boards and shamelessly selling her academic self to prospective institutions. (Although Anomie is aiming for an academic institution, she does secretly fear the harrowing process might land her in a mental one instead. Or worse, that she will get out there and find she can't tell the difference between the two).

However, there is help for the prospective traveler who fears becoming hopelessly wayward. Guidance can come in the form of blog posts, for example. With any luck, one can ride on the coattails of those journeymen a few steps ahead of oneself, and gain insights from watching their own hazing (just don't watch with too much open glee, for such blatant schadenfreude has a way of biting you in the ass later).

Another excellent source of advice is career workshops at conferences. Hailing from Ball State University, Melinda Messineo presided over a panel workshop on the academic job hunt at the American Sociological Association's annual meeting last month. Though it could have been a disaster quite easily (BOTH her co-panelists had very legitimate reasons for not being there), the panel of one was still among the best and most fruitful of the official ASA events I attended. It was an hour and forty-five minutes of jam-packed advice. Here are the highlights:

SELF-REFLECTION

Coming from a R1 institution (as many of us in PhD programs are), there is often a lot of expectation and pressure to follow in the footsteps of your professors and also go to a research institution. If you want that, that's great. However, it is important to ask yourself, "Is it the momentum of the academic process that is pushing you toward a research 1 institution, or is this really something you want to take on?"

Ultimately, it is your career to lead, so it is important to identify early on what you really want.

Some key questions to ask yourself:

*What attracted you to the discipline in the first place?
*What do you want in your life?
*Are there other things you want to dedicate time for?
*Do you want to work primarily with grad students or undergraduates?
*What about your ideal class size? Department size?
*Are you interested in getting into administration?

There are generally three types of institutions to choose from, distinguished largely by their varying emphasis on research versus teaching: First is the R1, which will have more of a research emphasis; second is the liberal arts college, will have a more heavy teaching emphasis; and finally there's the comprehensive university (often a state school), which will be more balanced. The way you present yourself to prospective employers will vary depending on the type of institution. And if you're really working it, each application will be specifically tailored to that school.
To some extent the "choice" is determined by your CV, since different institutions are looking for different things. You'll have a hard time getting a job at a teaching institution if you never taught, and you'll have a hard time getting a job in a research institution if you've never published.

CURRICULUM VITAE AND APPLICATION LETTER

The CV and letter should showcase your skills and achievements in three main areas: research, teaching, and service. The CV and letter should balance one another. Some schools only read the CV first; some only read the letter first. As such, it is a good idea to have both work as stand-alone documents. Your letter should sound confident but not arrogant. It should be personalized to the institution.

These three main sections (research, teaching, service) will vary in positioning depending upon what your target department is most interested in seeing. For the comprehensive university, which has equal emphasis, place your research first (I think that's a slight nod to the general belief that research has a higher status than teaching). The letter will have an additional section in which you explain your fit within that particular school. The CV will have an additional section in which you list your honors and awards (although you might mention particularly noteworthy ones in the letter as well).

ALERT: The bar is escalating regarding what it takes to get hired anywhere. Regardless of where you're applying, teaching experience is now expected. At least a bit, perhaps as a TA, even if you're going to an R1. Also, at least one publication is now expected, at least somewhere, even if you're going to a liberal arts college. Beyond that baseline, it is best to emphasize whichever facet reflects the type of institution to which you are applying.

Here's some advice that was new to me: when Messineo talked about the CV that you send out to prospective institutions, she talked about a much more in-depth CV than I have seen. It makes sense that the CV for the job market might be different than the CV you publish on your website, but it was not anything I had heard before. For example, she talked about including some data from your course evals in the CV under the section for each course. Also, she mentioned including an abstract of your dissertation in the CV itself. I'd be interested to hear how common such inclusions are, and if it varies depending on the type of institution you're applying to.

Another thing I hadn't heard before: Many of us are already aware that it's a bad idea to include your R&R's under your "Publications" heading in your CV. However, did you know that there's good reason to also limit your "Works in Progress" list to just R&R's and things that are *just* about to go out the door? Apparently, these publications might not count toward tenure at some institutions, since it is something you started before you got there. However, I also have heard that some institutions will count previous publications toward your tenure count. It probably varies by institution.

It is also helpful to have a professional website to send people to for further information. And, of course, be conscious of your web presence. As so well put by Messineo, "Do you remember that picture you had taken of you at that party, and your friends posted it on Facebook? Um.....I'm probably gonna see it." How professional you appear is going to make a difference.

For further information, great curriculum vitae
advice can also be found here, here, and here.

TEACHING PORTFOLIO

Start this as a grad student, when you get your first teaching gig. You may not need it during the hiring process, but you will need it for tenure, and it is beneficial to have evidence of how your teaching has evolved since that first timid class back in grad school. This is a critical way to demonstrate growth as an instructor.
While good teaching won't get you a job (or tenure), bad teaching may prevent it. You should have:

*a teaching philosophy
*learning objectives for your courses
*graphs of numerical data are nice (from evaluations)
*a selection of quotes from student evaluations
*a statement to the effect that "all comments are available upon request," which shows that you are not trying to hide anything
*midterm evaluations indicate that you are taking an extra step in your teaching

PHONE INTERVIEWS

The most important thing to keep in mind here is that any telephone communication with the prospective institution is an interview, even if they tell you it isn't. If you are on the job market, DON'T answer the phone while you are in the car, at a party, etc. if you don't recognize the number. For your scheduled telephone interview:

*Dress in interview clothes. They probably won't be doing a video chat, but just wearing the clothes puts you in the correct frame of mind.
*Have note cards ready, with key points you want to make, questions to ask, and answers to questions you think they will ask
*Have questions to ask
*Be at the computer if possible. Have a page open to the department's website. Have another page (or pages) open to the interviewer(s) personal homepage(s).
*Be authentic

Lots of people had many great questions during the course of the workshop. Perhaps I'll post some of them, with their answers, later. Unfortunately, this meant we ran out of time during the panel to get too much information about the on-campus interviews and negotiating the job offer, except (1) be authentic; you want a job where you'll fit in, so if you're gonna put the piercings right back in after you're hired, don't take them out in the first place, and (2) negotiate your salary; this is one of the few chances you get to do so. Don't forget things like start-up packages, moving finds, 1st year set-up money, computer and software needs.

And send a thank-you email to the interviewers.

If any readers have additional advice, I'd love to hear it.



7 comments:

Anonymous said...

About negotiating, talk to assistant professors and other "friendlies" about what's negotiable and what isn't at a particular school, what things to be sure to ask for, and what things can't be done at that school and will annoy people if you ask. I know of one school that had lots of money but happened to be (temporarily) short of space, and a private office was something you wouldn't get unless you put it in your offer. At most places, you don't need to ask for an office, it's taken for granted.

mom said...

Just a friendly amendment -- in my experience, comprehensive universities tend to be more teaching oriented (and have heavier teaching loads) and most SLACs require much more research than in the past (i.e., they are the ones where your career is more balanced). This may not be true all the time, but I recommend looking at the cvs of faculty before preparing your apps.

And some food for thought as you reflect on what you want - when I was in grad school, my adviser told me that "balance" was a euphemism for the worst of both worlds -- his wife was/is at a presigious SLAC, required to have a very impressive CV and to be a star in the classroom.

mybackstage said...

I have FOUR publication headings to take care of the problem you were discussing.

1. Referred publications
2. Publications Under Review --(this includes R&Rs as well as things I've just sent out)
3. Non-referred publications (examples) -- I just include a few of the examples of these I have.
4. Works in Progress -- I have this under teaching, not with the top three sections. Here I include titles, coauthors, and outlet GOALS.

I'm not sure about adding data and an abstract to your CV. I originally had a short research statement on my CV, but I was told that including that was distracting. They just want to be able to get the hard facts on the CV, and not to clutter it with other information.

Part of my fellowship this summer included a lot of work on my CV. If you search for my name on google (as it appears on facebook), you can find my CV. It's not beautiful, but it does reflect all of the myriad of advice I got. A new thing I hadn't heard was separating peer reviewed presentations (like ASA) from nonpeer reviewed (like MSS) -- and to do it in such a way that you can have International, National, Regional, and Other subheadings.

mybackstage said...

Um... yeah, that's refereed

carldyke said...

Persistence and flexibility. In my field (modern European intellectual history) there were about 20 t.t. jobs a year nationwide that roughly fit and upwards of 200 "highly qualified applicants" in play. It took me three years of applying to everything in sight and building my c.v. by teaching as an instructor in philosophy, sociology, and human development to get my current permanent job. I have a file of rejections six inches thick.

Or you can click right away. But maybe that first job isn't the time to get picky about where you end up for life. Like getting a loan, it's easier to get a job if you've already got one. Mine came after I'd worked myself into annual contracts the hard way, one class at a time. That said, there's nothing more frustrating than seeing the same batch of brats playing musical chairs with jobs you'd kill for.

I've now sat on and chaired hiring committees and when the stack of applications is a couple feet high with at least half of them well qualified, we're looking for pretty 'localized' discriminators. The more you can tailor your application to an understanding of the context you're putting it into, the better.

Finally, for smaller regional privates with smaller departments like mine the specifics of your research are unlikely to be super important or even interesting. We can't afford hyperspecialization or prima donnas. We want to see you're doing research and you're tuned into the field, but what we really want is for you to get here and hit the ground running without a lot of fuss and cover a bunch of classes across our whole curriculum, because we all do. We're looking for people with a record or at least promise of being excited to learn and teach new things on the fly.

Good luck!

Anonymous said...

A caveat: As I am situated in the UK, my advice could be a bit different than what is needed. At the same time, as I've been on the recruitment side, I may have a thing or two.

* Be prepared to discuss the service aspects. What can you bring to the table there? It's not that you need to lead with this, but do be prepared for these questions, for questions about your ability to arrange conferences and attract funding.

* As young/junior faculty, be prepared that some of the people on the committee are looking for your ability to teach the introductory courses; senior fac are possibly itching to teach their highly specialised modules based on research. That you can teach specialist modules is great, but just remember that some others may have been waiting patiently to do so. (Ah, I see that was touched upon a bit in hyperspecialisation above).

* Be very aware of the department and the school. Check out the website. I cannot say this enough. Be aware of the department's remit. If a programme announces that while other Universities teach abc but it focuses on xyz, do NOT send a message, or sell yourself based on your ability to teach and research abc. (Chances are we know how to teach it, but have decided to explore and build a department on an underdeveloped area.) This sounds self evident but I cannot tell you how many people make this error.

* When asked to submit things, be thorough and make sure you followed the instructions. I've seen people pretty much take themselves out of the running by not paying attention.

* There is so much not to take personally. The job search is a harrowing process but it is not about your worth as a scholar. So many people are cut for reasons having nothing to do about their excellence but about their fit-- or perceived fit. If you are a specialist in the same area as someone else, you might be out because we don't want to replicate expertise. You're an expert in 17th C British History? So is Dr VVV. If it's a small department, they might not be able to enjoy this overlap yet. (Excuse the examples, by avoiding my own field, I'll come off as a dunce.)

* I'm going to repeat that advice not to take rejection personally. It sucks, but the one thing about going through this process on the other side is seeing how much of this is not about the applicant as such.

* Oh, and even if you have doubts, if you really really want the (or a) job, do not let people see it. I've seen very qualified people not get jobs because search committees doubt the interest of the applicant in being there. Searching for applicants is an exhausting business-- we actually don't enjoy doing it so we want hires to stick. Better for everyone. (Here, the we is a mix of academic staff and administrative personnel. The former 'we' would prefer working on our monographs, or getting back to class prep, or finding ways to have a personal life.)

Sorry, this is all probably very basic but not to be disregarded.

Anonymous said...

And good luck! Sorry not to say that as well.